Overall score
Oxenford
61.8/100
Pacific Pines
68.8/100
Pacific Pines for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Oxenford
61.8/100
Pacific Pines
68.8/100
Crime rate
Oxenford
29.1 / 1k
Pacific Pines
35.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Oxenford
131
Pacific Pines
206
Population
Oxenford
12,273
Pacific Pines
16,664
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Oxenford | Pacific Pines |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.8/100 | 68.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.1 / 1k | 35.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 34 | 20 |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 54 |
| Walkability | 53.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 131 | 206 |
| Population | 12,273 | 16,664 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Oxenford is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Pacific Pines is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Oxenford is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Pacific Pines answers with schools and education options and public transport access.
On balance, value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pacific Pines, while Oxenford remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.