Nerang vs Pacific Pines, QLD suburb comparison

Pacific Pines for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NerangPacific Pines

Overall score

Nerang

49.7/100

Pacific Pines

68.8/100

Crime rate

Nerang

35.5 / 1k

Pacific Pines

35.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nerang

7

Pacific Pines

206

Population

Nerang

17,048

Pacific Pines

16,664

Metric leadNerang 3Pacific Pines 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNerangPacific Pines
Overall score49.7/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate35.5 / 1k35.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Parks & reserves3220
Public transport stops5854
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities7206
Population17,04816,664
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Nerang is a practical metro established suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, and Pacific Pines is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Nerang sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pacific Pines is in a middle-ring position.

Nerang tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while Pacific Pines stands out for schools and education options and walkability. On housing, Nerang sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Pacific Pines.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Pacific Pines, while Nerang remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons