Overall score
Gaven
45.3/100
Pacific Pines
56.2/100
Gaven for schools; Pacific Pines for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gaven
45.3/100
Pacific Pines
56.2/100
Crime rate
Gaven
56.8 / 1k
Pacific Pines
57.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gaven
5
Pacific Pines
208
Population
Gaven
1,638
Pacific Pines
16,664
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gaven | Pacific Pines |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.3/100 | 56.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.1/100 | 44.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 56.8 / 1k | 57.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 20 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 54 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 208 |
| Green cover | 12.8% | 16.9% |
| Population | 1,638 | 16,664 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Gaven reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; Pacific Pines is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Gaven sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pacific Pines is in a middle-ring position.
Pacific Pines holds the clearer edge on a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Gaven is closer across the remaining categories. On housing, Gaven sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Pacific Pines.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pacific Pines, while Gaven remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.