Maudsland vs Oxenford, QLD Suburb Comparison

Maudsland for schools; Oxenford for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaudslandOxenford

Overall score

Maudsland

42.4/100

Oxenford

48.5/100

Crime rate

Maudsland

46.3 / 1k

Oxenford

46.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maudsland

7

Oxenford

135

Population

Maudsland

8,073

Oxenford

12,273

Metric leadMaudsland 1Oxenford 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaudslandOxenford
Overall score42.4/10048.5/100
Housing (desirability)39.8/10056.5/100
Crime rate46.3 / 1k46.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves634
Public transport stops344
Walkability4.5/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities7135
Green cover8.5%12.7%
Population8,07312,273
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Maudsland is a sought-after metro established suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Oxenford is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Maudsland sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Oxenford is in a middle-ring position.

Maudsland pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Oxenford is the better pick for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Maudsland if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Oxenford for value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons