Maudsland vs Oxenford, QLD suburb comparison

Maudsland for retirees and families; Oxenford for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaudslandOxenford

Overall score

Maudsland

46.3/100

Oxenford

61.8/100

Crime rate

Maudsland

29.1 / 1k

Oxenford

29.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maudsland

6

Oxenford

131

Population

Maudsland

8,073

Oxenford

12,273

Metric leadMaudsland 1Oxenford 62 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaudslandOxenford
Overall score46.3/10061.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate29.1 / 1k29.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves634
Public transport stops344
Walkability4.5/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities6131
Population8,07312,273
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Maudsland is a practical metro established suburb with solid links to the wider city, and Oxenford is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Maudsland sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Oxenford is in a middle-ring position.

Maudsland pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Oxenford is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.

Choose Maudsland if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Oxenford for value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons