Overall score
Maudsland
42.4/100
Oxenford
48.5/100
Maudsland for schools; Oxenford for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Maudsland
42.4/100
Oxenford
48.5/100
Crime rate
Maudsland
46.3 / 1k
Oxenford
46.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Maudsland
7
Oxenford
135
Population
Maudsland
8,073
Oxenford
12,273
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Maudsland | Oxenford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.4/100 | 48.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.8/100 | 56.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.3 / 1k | 46.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 34 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 44 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 135 |
| Green cover | 8.5% | 12.7% |
| Population | 8,073 | 12,273 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Maudsland is a sought-after metro established suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Oxenford is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Maudsland sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Oxenford is in a middle-ring position.
Maudsland pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Oxenford is the better pick for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.
Choose Maudsland if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Oxenford for value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.