Overall score
Clagiraba
33.0/100
Mount Nathan
41.9/100
Clagiraba vs Mount Nathan, QLD suburb comparison
Mount Nathan for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ClagirabaMount Nathan
Crime rate
Clagiraba
34.9 / 1k
Mount Nathan
35.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clagiraba
7
Mount Nathan
4
Population
Clagiraba
651
Mount Nathan
1,375
Metric leadClagiraba 2Mount Nathan 42 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesMount Nathan
- Best for best valueMount Nathan
- Best for best schoolsMount Nathan
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clagiraba | Mount Nathan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.0/100 | 41.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.9 / 1k | 35.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 11 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 4 |
| Population | 651 | 1,375 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Clagiraba is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Mount Nathan is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Nathan sits among greener hillside streets, while Clagiraba keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Clagiraba tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities, while Mount Nathan stands out for parks and reserves and walkability.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Nathan, while Clagiraba remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.