Glen Eden vs O'Connell, QLD suburb comparison

Glen Eden for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Glen EdenO'Connell

Overall score

Glen Eden

49.1/100

O'Connell

30.9/100

Crime rate

Glen Eden

52.9 / 1k

O'Connell

52.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glen Eden

31

O'Connell

0

Population

Glen Eden

2,918

O'Connell

399

Metric leadGlen Eden 5O'Connell 11 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlen EdenO'Connell
Overall score49.1/10030.9/100
Housing (desirability)70.6/10048.7/100
Crime rate52.9 / 1k52.9 / 1k
Parks & reserves5
Walkability3.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities310
Population2,918399
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Glen Eden is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while O'Connell is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Glen Eden tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while O'Connell stands out for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Glen Eden sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in O'Connell.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Glen Eden, while O'Connell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons