Glenburn vs Kinglake, VIC Suburb Comparison

Glenburn for retirees and schools; Kinglake for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GlenburnKinglake

Overall score

Glenburn

49.8/100

Kinglake

39.6/100

Crime rate

Glenburn

39.0 / 1k

Kinglake

51.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glenburn

4

Kinglake

7

Population

Glenburn

443

Kinglake

1,662

Metric leadGlenburn 3Kinglake 63 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlenburnKinglake
Overall score49.8/10039.6/100
Housing (desirability)46.9/10051.1/100
Crime rate39.0 / 1k51.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops13
Walkability1.5/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities47
Planning activity1255
Green cover28.6%60.6%
Population4431,662
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Glenburn is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Kinglake is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Glenburn sits among greener hillside streets, while Kinglake keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Glenburn pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Kinglake is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Glenburn if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Kinglake for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons