Overall score
Kinglake
32.6/100
Kinglake Central
29.4/100
Kinglake for investment and value; Kinglake Central for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kinglake
32.6/100
Kinglake Central
29.4/100
Crime rate
Kinglake
48.8 / 1k
Kinglake Central
54.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kinglake
2
Kinglake Central
0
Population
Kinglake
1,662
Kinglake Central
413
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kinglake | Kinglake Central |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.6/100 | 29.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.6/100 | 32.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.8 / 1k | 54.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 9 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 55 | 22 |
| Population | 1,662 | 413 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Kinglake is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Kinglake Central is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Kinglake tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Kinglake Central stands out for public transport access and walkability.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Kinglake the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kinglake Central.