Overall score
Glenburn
49.8/100
Yea
38.9/100
Glenburn vs Yea, VIC Suburb Comparison
Glenburn for retirees and schools; Yea for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GlenburnYea
Crime rate
Glenburn
39.0 / 1k
Yea
73.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenburn
4
Yea
11
Population
Glenburn
443
Yea
1,789
Metric leadGlenburn 6Yea 42 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenburn | Yea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.8/100 | 38.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.9/100 | 64.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.0 / 1k | 73.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 46.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 11 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 35 |
| Green cover | 28.6% | 8.5% |
| Population | 443 | 1,789 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Glenburn reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Yea is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Glenburn sits among greener hillside streets, while Yea keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Glenburn is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Yea answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities. Glenburn generally means more mid-market housing value, while Yea leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Glenburn suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Yea is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.