Overall score
Glenelg North
52.8/100
Hove
55.3/100
Glenelg North vs Hove, SA Suburb Comparison
Glenelg North for investment and schools; Hove for retirees and beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Glenelg NorthHove
Crime rate
Glenelg North
44.8 / 1k
Hove
24.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenelg North
275
Hove
139
Population
Glenelg North
6,594
Hove
3,189
Metric leadGlenelg North 4Hove 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesHove
- Best for beach lifestyleHove
- Best for investmentGlenelg North
- Best for best schoolsGlenelg North
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenelg North | Hove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.8/100 | 55.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 69.7/100 | 60.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 44.8 / 1k | 24.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 40 | 17 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 71.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 275 | 139 |
| Planning activity | 79 | 36 |
| Green cover | 4.2% | 4.7% |
| Population | 6,594 | 3,189 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Glenelg North reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Hove is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.
On the data, Glenelg North is stronger for public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Hove answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.
Choose Glenelg North if you are weighing people chasing a beach lifestyle; lean toward Hove for retirees, families, and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.