Hove vs Seacliff, SA Suburb Comparison

Hove for retirees and beach lifestyle; Seacliff for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HoveSeacliff

Overall score

Hove

55.3/100

Seacliff

57.0/100

Crime rate

Hove

24.6 / 1k

Seacliff

28.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hove

139

Seacliff

142

Population

Hove

3,189

Seacliff

2,117

Metric leadHove 5Seacliff 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHoveSeacliff
Overall score55.3/10057.0/100
Housing (desirability)60.1/10060.0/100
Crime rate24.6 / 1k28.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1714
Walkability71.5/10067.0/100
Nearby amenities139142
Planning activity3630
Green cover4.7%7.0%
Population3,1892,117
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hove is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm, and Seacliff is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

Hove pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Seacliff is the better pick for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space.

On balance, retirees, families, and people chasing a beach lifestyle are more likely to prefer Hove, while Seacliff remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons