Hove vs Kingston Park, SA Suburb Comparison

Hove for retirees and beach lifestyle; Kingston Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HoveKingston Park

Overall score

Hove

55.3/100

Kingston Park

52.3/100

Crime rate

Hove

24.6 / 1k

Kingston Park

41.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hove

139

Kingston Park

64

Population

Hove

3,189

Kingston Park

623

Metric leadHove 7Kingston Park 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHoveKingston Park
Overall score55.3/10052.3/100
Housing (desirability)60.1/10058.8/100
Crime rate24.6 / 1k41.3 / 1k
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops171
Walkability71.5/1005.5/100
Nearby amenities13964
Planning activity366
Green cover4.7%12.2%
Population3,189623
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Hove reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Kingston Park is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living.

Hove pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Kingston Park is the better pick for housing affordability, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook.

Retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Hove the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingston Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons