Overall score
Glenfield
51.8/100
Macquarie Fields
61.3/100
Glenfield for retirees; Macquarie Fields for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glenfield
51.8/100
Macquarie Fields
61.3/100
Crime rate
Glenfield
235.1 / 1k
Macquarie Fields
96.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenfield
108
Macquarie Fields
282
Population
Glenfield
10,536
Macquarie Fields
14,023
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenfield | Macquarie Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.8/100 | 61.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 235.1 / 1k | 96.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 28 |
| Public transport stops | 110 | 170 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 81.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 108 | 282 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 13 |
| Population | 10,536 | 14,023 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 1/10 |
Glenfield reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Macquarie Fields is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Glenfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Macquarie Fields stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Glenfield generally means more sought-after housing, while Macquarie Fields leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Glenfield if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Macquarie Fields for families and households prioritising schools.