Glenfield vs Macquarie Fields, NSW suburb comparison

Glenfield for retirees; Macquarie Fields for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GlenfieldMacquarie Fields

Overall score

Glenfield

51.8/100

Macquarie Fields

61.3/100

Crime rate

Glenfield

235.1 / 1k

Macquarie Fields

96.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glenfield

108

Macquarie Fields

282

Population

Glenfield

10,536

Macquarie Fields

14,023

Metric leadGlenfield 3Macquarie Fields 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlenfieldMacquarie Fields
Overall score51.8/10061.3/100
Housing (desirability)57.4/10053.4/100
Crime rate235.1 / 1k96.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools107
Parks & reserves1228
Public transport stops110170
Walkability47.0/10081.0/100
Nearby amenities108282
Planning activity1313
Population10,53614,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/101/10

Comparison summary

Glenfield reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Macquarie Fields is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Glenfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Macquarie Fields stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Glenfield generally means more sought-after housing, while Macquarie Fields leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Glenfield if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Macquarie Fields for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons