Gnangara vs Hocking, WA Suburb Comparison

Gnangara for families and investment; Hocking for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GnangaraHocking

Overall score

Gnangara

38.9/100

Hocking

43.2/100

Crime rate

Gnangara

32.4 / 1k

Hocking

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gnangara

13

Hocking

35

Population

Gnangara

1,347

Hocking

6,987

Metric leadGnangara 1Hocking 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGnangaraHocking
Overall score38.9/10043.2/100
Housing (desirability)65.5/10052.4/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools—5
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves35
Public transport stops116
Walkability1.5/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities1335
Green cover1.7%10.4%
Population1,3476,987
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gnangara is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Hocking is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand.

On the data, Gnangara is stronger for a multicultural community mix and improving crime trends; Hocking answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability. Gnangara generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Hocking leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hocking, while Gnangara remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons