Overall score
Gnangara
38.9/100
Hocking
43.2/100
Gnangara for families and investment; Hocking for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gnangara
38.9/100
Hocking
43.2/100
Crime rate
Gnangara
32.4 / 1k
Hocking
32.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gnangara
13
Hocking
35
Population
Gnangara
1,347
Hocking
6,987
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gnangara | Hocking |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.9/100 | 43.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.5/100 | 52.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.4 / 1k | 32.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 16 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 35 |
| Green cover | 1.7% | 10.4% |
| Population | 1,347 | 6,987 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Gnangara is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Hocking is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand.
On the data, Gnangara is stronger for a multicultural community mix and improving crime trends; Hocking answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability. Gnangara generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Hocking leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hocking, while Gnangara remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.