Gnangara vs Hocking, WA suburb comparison

Hocking for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GnangaraHocking

Overall score

Gnangara

28.6/100

Hocking

49.2/100

Crime rate

Gnangara

8675.7 / 1k

Hocking

1667.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gnangara

1

Hocking

23

Population

Gnangara

1,347

Hocking

6,987

Metric leadGnangara 0Hocking 81 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGnangaraHocking
Overall score28.6/10049.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate8675.7 / 1k1667.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves35
Public transport stops116
Walkability1.5/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities123
Population1,3476,987
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gnangara is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Hocking is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm.

On the data, Gnangara is stronger for improving crime trends and a mature, settled community; Hocking answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Gnangara generally means more mid-market housing value, while Hocking leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hocking, while Gnangara remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons