Overall score
Gnangara
38.9/100
Pearsall
49.9/100
Gnangara vs Pearsall, WA Suburb Comparison
Gnangara for families; Pearsall for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GnangaraPearsall
Crime rate
Gnangara
32.4 / 1k
Pearsall
32.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gnangara
13
Pearsall
36
Population
Gnangara
1,347
Pearsall
4,244
Metric leadGnangara 1Pearsall 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gnangara | Pearsall |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.9/100 | 49.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.5/100 | 61.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.4 / 1k | 32.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 12 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 36 |
| Green cover | 1.7% | 6.4% |
| Population | 1,347 | 4,244 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Gnangara reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Pearsall is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
On the data, Gnangara is stronger for a multicultural community mix and improving crime trends; Pearsall answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Gnangara sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Pearsall.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pearsall, while Gnangara remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.