Goolwa vs Hindmarsh Island, SA Suburb Comparison

Goolwa for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GoolwaHindmarsh Island

Overall score

Goolwa

33.6/100

Hindmarsh Island

29.1/100

Crime rate

Goolwa

42.0 / 1k

Hindmarsh Island

18.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Goolwa

26

Hindmarsh Island

5

Population

Goolwa

2,558

Hindmarsh Island

1,846

Metric leadGoolwa 6Hindmarsh Island 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGoolwaHindmarsh Island
Overall score33.6/10029.1/100
Housing (desirability)57.5/10044.2/100
Crime rate42.0 / 1k18.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops5—
Walkability7.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities265
Planning activity137127
Green cover1.2%0.0%
Population2,5581,846
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Goolwa is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Hindmarsh Island is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Goolwa sits among greener hillside streets, while Hindmarsh Island keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Goolwa tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Hindmarsh Island stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Goolwa sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Hindmarsh Island.

Goolwa suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Hindmarsh Island is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons