Overall score
Harrison
50.4/100
Gosnells
43.9/100
Harrison vs Gosnells Suburb Comparison (ACT vs WA)
Harrison for families and value; Gosnells for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
HarrisonGosnells
Crime rate
Harrison
10.6 / 1k
Gosnells
63.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Harrison
155
Gosnells
791
Population
Harrison
8,244
Gosnells
21,149
Metric leadHarrison 5Gosnells 6across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Harrison | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.4/100 | 43.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.5/100 | 50.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 10.6 / 1k | 63.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | — | 143 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 70.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 155 | 791 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Green cover | 7.5% | 10.3% |
| Population | 8,244 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Across states, Harrison is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Harrison sits closer to the city centre, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.
Harrison pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.
Retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Harrison the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gosnells.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.