Overall score
Grays Point
52.1/100
Gymea
63.3/100
Grays Point vs Gymea, NSW Suburb Comparison
Grays Point for schools; Gymea for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Grays PointGymea
Crime rate
Grays Point
70.3 / 1k
Gymea
27.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Grays Point
65
Gymea
214
Population
Grays Point
3,034
Gymea
8,219
Metric leadGrays Point 2Gymea 92 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesGymea
- Best for familiesGymea
- Best for investmentGymea
- Best for best valueGymea
- Best for best schoolsGrays Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Grays Point | Gymea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.1/100 | 63.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.9/100 | 73.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 70.3 / 1k | 27.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 52 | 89 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 214 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 15 |
| Green cover | 3.6% | 2.2% |
| Population | 3,034 | 8,219 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Grays Point is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Gymea is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Grays Point pulls ahead on housing affordability, plus parks and reserves, whereas Gymea is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.
Choose Grays Point if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward Gymea for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.