Gymea vs Sylvania, NSW Suburb Comparison

Gymea for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GymeaSylvania

Overall score

Gymea

63.3/100

Sylvania

51.6/100

Crime rate

Gymea

27.5 / 1k

Sylvania

33.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gymea

214

Sylvania

109

Population

Gymea

8,219

Sylvania

10,749

Metric leadGymea 8Sylvania 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGymeaSylvania
Overall score63.3/10051.6/100
Housing (desirability)73.5/10044.7/100
Crime rate27.5 / 1k33.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools127
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves210
Public transport stops8984
Walkability57.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities214109
Planning activity1528
Green cover2.2%5.5%
Population8,21910,749
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Gymea is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Sylvania is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Gymea pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Sylvania is the better pick for parks and reserves, walkability, and a larger local community.

Choose Gymea if you are weighing retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Sylvania for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons