Overall score
Griffith
65.1/100
Hughes
62.0/100
Griffith for retirees; Hughes for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Griffith
65.1/100
Hughes
62.0/100
Crime rate
Griffith
26.2 / 1k
Hughes
8.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Griffith
220
Hughes
69
Population
Griffith
5,328
Hughes
3,210
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Griffith | Hughes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.1/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.3/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.2 / 1k | 8.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 66.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 220 | 69 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 5 |
| Green cover | 12.3% | 12.6% |
| Population | 5,328 | 3,210 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Griffith is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Hughes is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Griffith tends to lead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Hughes stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hughes, while Griffith remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.