Griffith vs Hughes, ACT Suburb Comparison

Griffith for retirees; Hughes for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GriffithHughes

Overall score

Griffith

65.1/100

Hughes

62.0/100

Crime rate

Griffith

26.2 / 1k

Hughes

8.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Griffith

220

Hughes

69

Population

Griffith

5,328

Hughes

3,210

Metric leadGriffith 6Hughes 33 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGriffithHughes
Overall score65.1/10062.0/100
Housing (desirability)55.3/10042.5/100
Crime rate26.2 / 1k8.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1010
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves21
Walkability100.0/10066.5/100
Nearby amenities22069
Planning activity125
Green cover12.3%12.6%
Population5,3283,210
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Griffith is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Hughes is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Griffith tends to lead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Hughes stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hughes, while Griffith remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Griffith vs Hughes, ACT Suburb Comparison | Suburb Guide