Overall score
Griffith
65.1/100
Lyons
58.5/100
Griffith vs Lyons, ACT Suburb Comparison
Griffith for retirees; Lyons for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GriffithLyons
Crime rate
Griffith
26.2 / 1k
Lyons
17.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Griffith
220
Lyons
111
Population
Griffith
5,328
Lyons
3,271
Metric leadGriffith 7Lyons 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Griffith | Lyons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.1/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.3/100 | 55.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.2 / 1k | 17.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 220 | 111 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 5 |
| Green cover | 12.3% | 18.7% |
| Population | 5,328 | 3,271 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Griffith reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Lyons is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Griffith tends to lead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Lyons stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
Griffith suits investors more clearly, whereas Lyons is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.