Overall score
Holder
66.1/100
Lyons
58.5/100
Holder vs Lyons, ACT Suburb Comparison
Holder for retirees and families; Lyons for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
HolderLyons
Crime rate
Holder
6.2 / 1k
Lyons
17.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Holder
95
Lyons
111
Population
Holder
2,816
Lyons
3,271
Metric leadHolder 6Lyons 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Holder | Lyons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.1/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.6/100 | 55.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 6.2 / 1k | 17.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 70.0/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 95 | 111 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 5 |
| Green cover | 15.7% | 18.7% |
| Population | 2,816 | 3,271 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Holder reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Lyons is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Holder is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability; Lyons answers with schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
Holder suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Lyons is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.