Hughes vs Lyons, ACT Suburb Comparison

Hughes for retirees and families; Lyons for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HughesLyons

Overall score

Hughes

62.0/100

Lyons

58.5/100

Crime rate

Hughes

8.0 / 1k

Lyons

17.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hughes

69

Lyons

111

Population

Hughes

3,210

Lyons

3,271

Metric leadHughes 5Lyons 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHughesLyons
Overall score62.0/10058.5/100
Housing (desirability)42.5/10055.2/100
Crime rate8.0 / 1k17.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools109
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves1
Walkability66.5/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities69111
Planning activity55
Green cover12.6%18.7%
Population3,2103,271
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hughes is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Lyons is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Hughes is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Lyons answers with nearby cafés and amenities, plus a larger local community.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Hughes, while Lyons remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Hughes vs Lyons, ACT Suburb Comparison | Suburb Guide