Grove vs Lucaston, TAS Suburb Comparison

Grove for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GroveLucaston

Overall score

Grove

51.3/100

Lucaston

37.5/100

Crime rate

Grove

22.8 / 1k

Lucaston

22.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Grove

9

Lucaston

10

Population

Grove

533

Lucaston

422

Metric leadGrove 4Lucaston 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGroveLucaston
Overall score51.3/10037.5/100
Housing (desirability)56.2/10056.5/100
Crime rate22.8 / 1k22.8 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops6—
Walkability11.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities910
Green cover2.0%0.9%
Population533422
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Grove is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Lucaston is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Grove tends to lead on walkability and a larger local community, while Lucaston stands out for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Lucaston, while Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons