Overall score
Lucaston
37.5/100
Mountain River
39.4/100
Mountain River for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lucaston
37.5/100
Mountain River
39.4/100
Crime rate
Lucaston
22.8 / 1k
Mountain River
22.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lucaston
10
Mountain River
0
Population
Lucaston
422
Mountain River
606
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lucaston | Mountain River |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.5/100 | 39.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.5/100 | 61.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.8 / 1k | 22.8 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 10 | 0 |
| Green cover | 0.9% | 0.4% |
| Population | 422 | 606 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Lucaston reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Mountain River is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mountain River sits among greener hillside streets, while Lucaston keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Lucaston pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Mountain River is the better pick for a larger local community.
Neither suburb has a sharp audience split here. The better choice between Lucaston and Mountain River comes down to which lifestyle trade-offs matter most to you.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.