Grovedale vs Waurn Ponds, VIC Suburb Comparison

Grovedale for retirees and investment; Waurn Ponds for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GrovedaleWaurn Ponds

Overall score

Grovedale

54.9/100

Waurn Ponds

42.3/100

Crime rate

Grovedale

56.1 / 1k

Waurn Ponds

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Grovedale

383

Waurn Ponds

135

Population

Grovedale

14,869

Waurn Ponds

4,956

Metric leadGrovedale 8Waurn Ponds 31 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGrovedaleWaurn Ponds
Overall score54.9/10042.3/100
Housing (desirability)71.6/10038.4/100
Crime rate56.1 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools7—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves85
Public transport stops8618
Walkability100.0/10027.0/100
Nearby amenities383135
Planning activity8830
Green cover9.6%1.3%
Population14,8694,956
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Grovedale is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Waurn Ponds is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Grovedale tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Waurn Ponds stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Grovedale generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Waurn Ponds leans toward more sought-after housing.

Grovedale suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Waurn Ponds is the stronger match for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons