Overall score
Gungahlin
53.0/100
Mount Gambier
51.5/100
Gungahlin for families and schools; Mount Gambier for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gungahlin
53.0/100
Mount Gambier
51.5/100
Crime rate
Gungahlin
52.4 / 1k
Mount Gambier
58.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gungahlin
511
Mount Gambier
565
Population
Gungahlin
8,586
Mount Gambier
25,591
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gungahlin | Mount Gambier |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.0/100 | 51.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 70.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 52.4 / 1k | 58.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 20 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | — | 121 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 511 | 565 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 238 |
| Green cover | 10.0% | 8.0% |
| Population | 8,586 | 25,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 1/10 |
Gungahlin (ACT) is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Mount Gambier (SA) is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Gungahlin keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Gungahlin is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Mount Gambier answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and nearby cafés and amenities. Gungahlin generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Gambier leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Gungahlin if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Mount Gambier for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.