Hackett vs Lyneham, ACT suburb comparison

Hackett for investment and value; Lyneham for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HackettLyneham

Overall score

Hackett

58.9/100

Lyneham

57.8/100

Crime rate

Hackett

22.5 / 1k

Lyneham

35.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hackett

73

Lyneham

177

Population

Hackett

3,227

Lyneham

5,703

Metric leadHackett 5Lyneham 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHackettLyneham
Overall score58.9/10057.8/100
Housing (desirability)48.8/10019.9/100
Crime rate22.5 / 1k35.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Parks & reserves4
Walkability50.0/10073.0/100
Nearby amenities73177
Planning activity57
Population3,2275,703
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hackett is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Lyneham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Hackett is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Lyneham answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hackett, while Lyneham remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons