Overall score
Hackett
50.4/100
Lyneham
57.4/100
Hackett for families and value; Lyneham for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hackett
50.4/100
Lyneham
57.4/100
Crime rate
Hackett
22.5 / 1k
Lyneham
35.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hackett
76
Lyneham
193
Population
Hackett
3,227
Lyneham
5,703
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hackett | Lyneham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.4/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.2/100 | 56.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.5 / 1k | 35.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Walkability | 50.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 76 | 193 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 8 |
| Green cover | 8.6% | 17.3% |
| Population | 3,227 | 5,703 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Hackett is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Lyneham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Hackett is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Lyneham answers with walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Hackett the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Lyneham.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.