Hackett vs Lyneham, ACT Suburb Comparison

Hackett for families and value; Lyneham for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HackettLyneham

Overall score

Hackett

50.4/100

Lyneham

57.4/100

Crime rate

Hackett

22.5 / 1k

Lyneham

35.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hackett

76

Lyneham

193

Population

Hackett

3,227

Lyneham

5,703

Metric leadHackett 3Lyneham 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHackettLyneham
Overall score50.4/10057.4/100
Housing (desirability)52.2/10056.2/100
Crime rate22.5 / 1k35.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves—4
Walkability50.0/10073.0/100
Nearby amenities76193
Planning activity58
Green cover8.6%17.3%
Population3,2275,703
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hackett is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Lyneham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Hackett is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Lyneham answers with walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Hackett the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Lyneham.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons