Overall score
Dickson
59.6/100
Hackett
50.4/100
Dickson vs Hackett, ACT Suburb Comparison
Dickson for retirees and schools; Hackett for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
DicksonHackett
Crime rate
Dickson
92.9 / 1k
Hackett
22.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dickson
345
Hackett
76
Population
Dickson
3,292
Hackett
3,227
Metric leadDickson 6Hackett 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dickson | Hackett |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.6/100 | 50.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.0/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 92.9 / 1k | 22.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 50.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 345 | 76 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 5 |
| Green cover | 4.4% | 8.6% |
| Population | 3,292 | 3,227 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Dickson is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Hackett is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Dickson pulls ahead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Hackett is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Dickson the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Hackett.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.