Dickson vs Hackett, ACT suburb comparison

Dickson for families and schools; Hackett for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DicksonHackett

Overall score

Dickson

66.1/100

Hackett

58.9/100

Crime rate

Dickson

92.9 / 1k

Hackett

22.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dickson

334

Hackett

73

Population

Dickson

3,292

Hackett

3,227

Metric leadDickson 5Hackett 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDicksonHackett
Overall score66.1/10058.9/100
Housing (desirability)25.5/10048.8/100
Crime rate92.9 / 1k22.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools136
Parks & reserves1
Walkability100.0/10050.0/100
Nearby amenities33473
Planning activity105
Population3,2923,227
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Dickson is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Hackett is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Dickson pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Hackett is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Dickson the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hackett.

Related comparisons