Hamersley vs Westminster, WA Suburb Comparison

Hamersley for families and investment; Westminster for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HamersleyWestminster

Overall score

Hamersley

49.8/100

Westminster

45.3/100

Crime rate

Hamersley

47.4 / 1k

Westminster

47.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hamersley

67

Westminster

82

Population

Hamersley

5,209

Westminster

7,042

Metric leadHamersley 6Westminster 42 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHamersleyWestminster
Overall score49.8/10045.3/100
Housing (desirability)69.0/10056.5/100
Crime rate47.4 / 1k47.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools419
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves54
Public transport stops3430
Walkability30.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities6782
Green cover22.9%4.7%
Population5,2097,042
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Hamersley is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Westminster is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Hamersley sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Westminster is closer to the city centre.

On the data, Hamersley is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Westminster answers with schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Hamersley suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Westminster is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons