Tuart Hill vs Westminster, WA Suburb Comparison

Tuart Hill for investment and schools; Westminster for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Tuart HillWestminster

Overall score

Tuart Hill

47.2/100

Westminster

45.3/100

Crime rate

Tuart Hill

47.4 / 1k

Westminster

47.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Tuart Hill

91

Westminster

82

Population

Tuart Hill

7,541

Westminster

7,042

Metric leadTuart Hill 6Westminster 33 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryTuart HillWestminster
Overall score47.2/10045.3/100
Housing (desirability)58.5/10056.5/100
Crime rate47.4 / 1k47.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools919
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops3230
Walkability75.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities9182
Green cover4.7%4.7%
Population7,5417,042
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Tuart Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Westminster is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Tuart Hill tends to lead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, while Westminster stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Retirees may find Tuart Hill the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Westminster.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons