Tuart Hill vs Westminster, WA suburb comparison

Tuart Hill for retirees; Westminster for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Tuart HillWestminster

Overall score

Tuart Hill

45.6/100

Westminster

51.6/100

Crime rate

Tuart Hill

1344.4 / 1k

Westminster

1451.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Tuart Hill

71

Westminster

58

Population

Tuart Hill

7,541

Westminster

7,042

Metric leadTuart Hill 5Westminster 5across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryTuart HillWestminster
Overall score45.6/10051.6/100
Housing (desirability)24.4/10033.5/100
Crime rate1344.4 / 1k1451.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools919
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops3230
Walkability75.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities7158
Population7,5417,042
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Tuart Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Westminster is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Tuart Hill tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Westminster stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves. On housing, Tuart Hill sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Westminster.

Retirees may find Tuart Hill the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Westminster.

Related comparisons

Tuart Hill vs Westminster, WA suburb… | Suburb Guide