Glendalough vs Tuart Hill, WA Suburb Comparison

Glendalough for retirees and families; Tuart Hill for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GlendaloughTuart Hill

Overall score

Glendalough

45.1/100

Tuart Hill

47.2/100

Crime rate

Glendalough

47.4 / 1k

Tuart Hill

47.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glendalough

61

Tuart Hill

91

Population

Glendalough

2,628

Tuart Hill

7,541

Metric leadGlendalough 1Tuart Hill 92 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlendaloughTuart Hill
Overall score45.1/10047.2/100
Housing (desirability)52.1/10058.5/100
Crime rate47.4 / 1k47.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools79
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops832
Walkability14.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities6191
Green cover24.9%4.7%
Population2,6287,541
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Glendalough is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Tuart Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Glendalough pulls ahead on a hub for schools and preschools, plus highly regarded local schools, whereas Tuart Hill is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Glendalough the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Tuart Hill.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons