Overall score
Stirling
59.4/100
Tuart Hill
45.6/100
Stirling vs Tuart Hill, WA suburb comparison
Stirling for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
StirlingTuart Hill
Crime rate
Stirling
857.7 / 1k
Tuart Hill
1344.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Stirling
85
Tuart Hill
71
Population
Stirling
10,165
Tuart Hill
7,541
Metric leadStirling 8Tuart Hill 2across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Stirling | Tuart Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.4/100 | 45.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 24.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 857.7 / 1k | 1344.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 60 | 32 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 71 |
| Population | 10,165 | 7,541 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Stirling is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Tuart Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Stirling tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Tuart Hill stands out for walkability.
Retirees and investors may find Stirling the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tuart Hill.