Doubleview vs Stirling, WA suburb comparison

Doubleview for families and schools; Stirling for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DoubleviewStirling

Overall score

Doubleview

58.4/100

Stirling

59.4/100

Crime rate

Doubleview

1153.7 / 1k

Stirling

857.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Doubleview

60

Stirling

85

Population

Doubleview

9,205

Stirling

10,165

Metric leadDoubleview 2Stirling 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDoubleviewStirling
Overall score58.4/10059.4/100
Housing (desirability)34.5/10076.0/100
Crime rate1153.7 / 1k857.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools125
Parks & reserves311
Public transport stops3760
Walkability86.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities6085
Population9,20510,165
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Doubleview is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Stirling is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Doubleview pulls ahead on walkability, whereas Stirling is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Doubleview suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Stirling is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons