Overall score
Churchlands
61.7/100
Doubleview
53.6/100
Churchlands vs Doubleview, WA Suburb Comparison
Churchlands for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChurchlandsDoubleview
Crime rate
Churchlands
47.4 / 1k
Doubleview
47.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Churchlands
141
Doubleview
87
Population
Churchlands
3,638
Doubleview
9,205
Metric leadChurchlands 3Doubleview 63 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesChurchlands
- Best for familiesChurchlands
- Best for best valueChurchlands
- Best for best schoolsChurchlands
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Churchlands | Doubleview |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.7/100 | 53.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.8/100 | 55.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.4 / 1k | 47.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 37 |
| Walkability | 76.0/100 | 86.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 141 | 87 |
| Green cover | 8.0% | 2.6% |
| Population | 3,638 | 9,205 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Churchlands is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Doubleview is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Churchlands is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities; Doubleview answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Doubleview, while Churchlands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.