Churchlands vs Osborne Park, WA Suburb Comparison

Churchlands for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChurchlandsOsborne Park

Overall score

Churchlands

61.7/100

Osborne Park

54.6/100

Crime rate

Churchlands

47.4 / 1k

Osborne Park

47.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Churchlands

141

Osborne Park

298

Population

Churchlands

3,638

Osborne Park

4,463

Metric leadChurchlands 5Osborne Park 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChurchlandsOsborne Park
Overall score61.7/10054.6/100
Housing (desirability)46.8/10057.8/100
Crime rate47.4 / 1k47.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools74
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops2271
Walkability76.0/10081.0/100
Nearby amenities141298
Planning activity—1
Green cover8.0%0.8%
Population3,6384,463
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Churchlands is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Osborne Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Churchlands is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Osborne Park answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Churchlands, while Osborne Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons