Overall score
Churchlands
55.9/100
Osborne Park
51.8/100
Churchlands vs Osborne Park, WA suburb comparison
Churchlands for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChurchlandsOsborne Park
Crime rate
Churchlands
3004.5 / 1k
Osborne Park
4769.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Churchlands
100
Osborne Park
214
Population
Churchlands
3,638
Osborne Park
4,463
Metric leadChurchlands 6Osborne Park 4across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesChurchlands
- Best for best valueChurchlands
- Best for best schoolsChurchlands
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Churchlands | Osborne Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.9/100 | 51.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 33.5/100 | 23.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 3004.5 / 1k | 4769.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 71 |
| Walkability | 74.0/100 | 77.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 100 | 214 |
| Planning activity | — | 1 |
| Population | 3,638 | 4,463 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Churchlands is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Osborne Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Churchlands is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Osborne Park answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Choose Churchlands if you are weighing value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools; lean toward Osborne Park for retirees and families.