Churchlands vs Glendalough, WA suburb comparison

Churchlands for retirees and investment; Glendalough for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChurchlandsGlendalough

Overall score

Churchlands

55.9/100

Glendalough

39.7/100

Crime rate

Churchlands

3004.5 / 1k

Glendalough

4081.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Churchlands

100

Glendalough

18

Population

Churchlands

3,638

Glendalough

2,628

Metric leadChurchlands 9Glendalough 01 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChurchlandsGlendalough
Overall score55.9/10039.7/100
Housing (desirability)33.5/10011.6/100
Crime rate3004.5 / 1k4081.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops228
Walkability74.0/10012.0/100
Nearby amenities10018
Population3,6382,628
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/104/10

Comparison summary

Churchlands is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Glendalough is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city.

Churchlands tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Glendalough stands out for improving crime trends.

Churchlands suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Glendalough is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons