Overall score
Churchlands
61.7/100
Glendalough
45.1/100
Churchlands vs Glendalough, WA Suburb Comparison
Churchlands for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChurchlandsGlendalough
Crime rate
Churchlands
47.4 / 1k
Glendalough
47.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Churchlands
141
Glendalough
61
Population
Churchlands
3,638
Glendalough
2,628
Metric leadChurchlands 7Glendalough 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesChurchlands
- Best for familiesChurchlands
- Best for investmentChurchlands
- Best for best valueChurchlands
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Churchlands | Glendalough |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.7/100 | 45.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.8/100 | 52.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.4 / 1k | 47.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 8 |
| Walkability | 76.0/100 | 14.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 141 | 61 |
| Green cover | 8.0% | 24.9% |
| Population | 3,638 | 2,628 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Churchlands is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Glendalough is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Churchlands tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Glendalough stands out for a hub for schools and preschools, plus highly regarded local schools.
Churchlands suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Glendalough is the stronger match for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.