Overall score
Glendalough
39.7/100
Woodlands
50.9/100
Glendalough vs Woodlands, WA suburb comparison
Woodlands for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GlendaloughWoodlands
Crime rate
Glendalough
4081.0 / 1k
Woodlands
2353.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glendalough
18
Woodlands
29
Population
Glendalough
2,628
Woodlands
4,551
Metric leadGlendalough 0Woodlands 10across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glendalough | Woodlands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.7/100 | 50.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 11.6/100 | 37.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 4081.0 / 1k | 2353.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 8 | 18 |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 60.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 29 |
| Population | 2,628 | 4,551 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Glendalough is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city, and Woodlands is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel.
On the data, Glendalough is stronger for improving crime trends; Woodlands answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Woodlands, while Glendalough remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.