Stirling vs Woodlands, WA suburb comparison

Stirling for investment and value; Woodlands for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

StirlingWoodlands

Overall score

Stirling

59.4/100

Woodlands

50.9/100

Crime rate

Stirling

857.7 / 1k

Woodlands

2353.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Stirling

85

Woodlands

29

Population

Stirling

10,165

Woodlands

4,551

Metric leadStirling 7Woodlands 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryStirlingWoodlands
Overall score59.4/10050.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10037.1/100
Crime rate857.7 / 1k2353.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Parks & reserves113
Public transport stops6018
Walkability32.0/10060.0/100
Nearby amenities8529
Population10,1654,551
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Stirling is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Woodlands is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel.

On the data, Stirling is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Woodlands answers with walkability.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Stirling the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Woodlands.

Related comparisons

Stirling vs Woodlands, WA suburb comparison | Suburb Guide