Osborne Park vs Stirling, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Osborne Park | Stirling |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.3/100 | 57.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 71 | 60 |
| Walkability | 77.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 214 | 85 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 4,463 | 10,165 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesStirling
- Best for familiesOsborne Park
- Best for investmentStirling
- Best for best valueStirling
- Best for best schoolsOsborne Park
Comparison summary
Osborne Park and Stirling (WA) offer different strengths across official suburb data. Stirling (WA) leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Stirling (WA); Housing (desirability) favours Stirling (WA); Parks & reserves favours Stirling (WA). Quick verdicts: Retirees → Stirling (WA), Families → Osborne Park, Investment → Stirling (WA), Best value → Stirling (WA).