Overall score
Osborne Park
51.8/100
Stirling
59.4/100
Osborne Park vs Stirling, WA suburb comparison
Osborne Park for families and schools; Stirling for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Osborne ParkStirling
Crime rate
Osborne Park
4769.8 / 1k
Stirling
857.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Osborne Park
214
Stirling
85
Population
Osborne Park
4,463
Stirling
10,165
Metric leadOsborne Park 3Stirling 7across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesStirling
- Best for familiesOsborne Park
- Best for investmentStirling
- Best for best valueStirling
- Best for best schoolsOsborne Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Osborne Park | Stirling |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.8/100 | 59.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 4769.8 / 1k | 857.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 71 | 60 |
| Walkability | 77.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 214 | 85 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 4,463 | 10,165 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Osborne Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Stirling is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Osborne Park pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Stirling is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Osborne Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Stirling for retirees and investors.