Overall score
Osborne Park
51.8/100
Woodlands
50.9/100
Osborne Park vs Woodlands, WA suburb comparison
Woodlands for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Osborne ParkWoodlands
Crime rate
Osborne Park
4769.8 / 1k
Woodlands
2353.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Osborne Park
214
Woodlands
29
Population
Osborne Park
4,463
Woodlands
4,551
Metric leadOsborne Park 4Woodlands 6across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Osborne Park | Woodlands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.8/100 | 50.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.0/100 | 37.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 4769.8 / 1k | 2353.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 71 | 18 |
| Walkability | 77.0/100 | 60.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 214 | 29 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 4,463 | 4,551 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Osborne Park reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Woodlands is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel.
Osborne Park tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Woodlands stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Woodlands, while Osborne Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.