Overall score
Harcourt North
34.9/100
Sedgwick
40.0/100
Sedgwick for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Harcourt North
34.9/100
Sedgwick
40.0/100
Crime rate
Harcourt North
39.1 / 1k
Sedgwick
9.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Harcourt North
0
Sedgwick
0
Population
Harcourt North
291
Sedgwick
614
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Harcourt North | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.9/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.1/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.1 / 1k | 9.8 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 38 |
| Population | 291 | 614 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Harcourt North is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Sedgwick is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Harcourt North is stronger for parks and reserves and a calmer planning outlook; Sedgwick answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Sedgwick, while Harcourt North remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.