Overall score
Mandurang South
38.5/100
Sedgwick
40.0/100
Mandurang South for value; Sedgwick for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mandurang South
38.5/100
Sedgwick
40.0/100
Crime rate
Mandurang South
36.7 / 1k
Sedgwick
9.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mandurang South
1
Sedgwick
0
Population
Mandurang South
280
Sedgwick
614
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mandurang South | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.5/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.0/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 36.7 / 1k | 9.8 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 38 |
| Population | 280 | 614 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Mandurang South reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Sedgwick is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Mandurang South tends to lead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Sedgwick stands out for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability.
Mandurang South suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Sedgwick is the stronger match for retirees and families.