Overall score
Mandurang South
49.6/100
Sedgwick
52.3/100
Mandurang South for value; Sedgwick for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mandurang South
49.6/100
Sedgwick
52.3/100
Crime rate
Mandurang South
33.6 / 1k
Sedgwick
11.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mandurang South
2
Sedgwick
2
Population
Mandurang South
280
Sedgwick
614
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mandurang South | Sedgwick |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.6/100 | 52.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.6/100 | 43.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.6 / 1k | 11.2 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 38 |
| Green cover | 1.3% | 15.5% |
| Population | 280 | 614 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Mandurang South reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Sedgwick is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Mandurang South tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Sedgwick stands out for a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a larger local community.
Mandurang South suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Sedgwick is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.