Overall score
Harkness
55.3/100
Kurunjang
47.1/100
Harkness for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Harkness
55.3/100
Kurunjang
47.1/100
Crime rate
Harkness
44.8 / 1k
Kurunjang
80.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Harkness
32
Kurunjang
50
Population
Harkness
12,463
Kurunjang
10,711
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Harkness | Kurunjang |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.3/100 | 47.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 44.8 / 1k | 80.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 37 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 32 | 50 |
| Planning activity | 19 | 22 |
| Population | 12,463 | 10,711 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 2/10 |
Harkness reads as a practical metro established suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm; Kurunjang is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Harkness sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kurunjang is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Harkness is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Kurunjang answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Harkness, while Kurunjang remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.