Kurunjang vs Toolern Vale, VIC Suburb Comparison

Kurunjang for retirees and investment; Toolern Vale for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KurunjangToolern Vale

Overall score

Kurunjang

30.6/100

Toolern Vale

31.1/100

Crime rate

Kurunjang

76.4 / 1k

Toolern Vale

168.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kurunjang

40

Toolern Vale

9

Population

Kurunjang

10,711

Toolern Vale

818

Metric leadKurunjang 9Toolern Vale 21 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKurunjangToolern Vale
Overall score30.6/10031.1/100
Housing (desirability)52.9/10023.4/100
Crime rate76.4 / 1k168.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves32
Public transport stops37—
Walkability30.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities409
Planning activity2224
Green cover10.3%3.1%
Population10,711818
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kurunjang is a practical metro established suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, and Toolern Vale is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Kurunjang sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Toolern Vale is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Kurunjang is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Toolern Vale answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage. Kurunjang generally means more approachable housing costs, while Toolern Vale leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Kurunjang suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Toolern Vale is the stronger match for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons