Hawks Nest vs Tea Gardens, NSW suburb comparison

Hawks Nest for retirees and families; Tea Gardens for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hawks NestTea Gardens

Overall score

Hawks Nest

32.3/100

Tea Gardens

36.7/100

Crime rate

Hawks Nest

Tea Gardens

105.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hawks Nest

0

Tea Gardens

0

Population

Hawks Nest

1,413

Tea Gardens

3,288

Metric leadHawks Nest 2Tea Gardens 52 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHawks NestTea Gardens
Overall score32.3/10036.7/100
Housing (desirability)10.6/10062.8/100
Crime rate105.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves45
Public transport stops3337
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Planning activity1622
Population1,4133,288
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hawks Nest is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone, and Tea Gardens is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone.

Hawks Nest tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Tea Gardens stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves. On housing, Hawks Nest sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Tea Gardens.

Hawks Nest suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Tea Gardens is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons