Overall score
Hawks Nest
43.6/100
Tea Gardens
37.9/100
Hawks Nest for families and schools; Tea Gardens for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hawks Nest
43.6/100
Tea Gardens
37.9/100
Crime rate
Hawks Nest
—
Tea Gardens
105.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hawks Nest
19
Tea Gardens
6
Population
Hawks Nest
1,413
Tea Gardens
3,288
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hawks Nest | Tea Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.6/100 | 37.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.3/100 | 60.6/100 |
| Crime rate | — | 105.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 37 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 19 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 26 |
| Green cover | 0.5% | 4.2% |
| Population | 1,413 | 3,288 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Put side by side, Hawks Nest is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone, and Tea Gardens is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone.
Hawks Nest tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Tea Gardens stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Hawks Nest sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Tea Gardens.
Hawks Nest suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Tea Gardens is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.