Hillman vs Rockingham, WA suburb comparison

Rockingham for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HillmanRockingham

Overall score

Hillman

28.2/100

Rockingham

64.2/100

Crime rate

Hillman

3967.7 / 1k

Rockingham

877.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hillman

16

Rockingham

225

Population

Hillman

1,807

Rockingham

15,312

Metric leadHillman 0Rockingham 9across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHillmanRockingham
Overall score28.2/10064.2/100
Housing (desirability)35.7/10052.4/100
Crime rate3967.7 / 1k877.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools49
Parks & reserves18
Public transport stops15138
Walkability22.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities16225
Population1,80715,312
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hillman is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Rockingham is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Rockingham leans into coastal living, while Hillman feels more inland and suburban in character.

Hillman tends to lead on relatively affordable housing and improving crime trends, while Rockingham stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Hillman suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Rockingham is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons