Holland Park vs Mount Gravatt East, QLD Suburb Comparison

Holland Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Holland ParkMount Gravatt East

Overall score

Holland Park

59.5/100

Mount Gravatt East

52.0/100

Crime rate

Holland Park

42.3 / 1k

Mount Gravatt East

97.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Holland Park

149

Mount Gravatt East

196

Population

Holland Park

8,671

Mount Gravatt East

12,428

Metric leadHolland Park 5Mount Gravatt East 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHolland ParkMount Gravatt East
Overall score59.5/10052.0/100
Housing (desirability)62.4/10067.0/100
Crime rate42.3 / 1k97.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools126
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves87
Public transport stops4866
Walkability40.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities149196
Green cover7.6%3.2%
Population8,67112,428
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Holland Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Mount Gravatt East is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Gravatt East sits among greener hillside streets, while Holland Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Holland Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Mount Gravatt East is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Holland Park, while Mount Gravatt East remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons