Overall score
Holland Park
66.9/100
Mount Gravatt
59.2/100
Holland Park for retirees and investment; Mount Gravatt for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Holland Park
66.9/100
Mount Gravatt
59.2/100
Crime rate
Holland Park
26.1 / 1k
Mount Gravatt
60.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Holland Park
146
Mount Gravatt
237
Population
Holland Park
8,671
Mount Gravatt
3,733
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Holland Park | Mount Gravatt |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.9/100 | 59.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.1 / 1k | 60.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 25 |
| Walkability | 40.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 146 | 237 |
| Population | 8,671 | 3,733 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Holland Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Mount Gravatt is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Holland Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Holland Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Gravatt stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees and investors may find Holland Park the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Gravatt.