Overall score
Holland Park
59.5/100
Mount Gravatt
58.9/100
Holland Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Holland Park
59.5/100
Mount Gravatt
58.9/100
Crime rate
Holland Park
42.3 / 1k
Mount Gravatt
97.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Holland Park
149
Mount Gravatt
245
Population
Holland Park
8,671
Mount Gravatt
3,733
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Holland Park | Mount Gravatt |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.5/100 | 58.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.4/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.3 / 1k | 97.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 25 |
| Walkability | 40.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 149 | 245 |
| Green cover | 7.6% | 10.2% |
| Population | 8,671 | 3,733 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Holland Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Mount Gravatt is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Holland Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Holland Park tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Mount Gravatt stands out for walkability, plus nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Holland Park the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Gravatt.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.