Overall score
Mount Gravatt
59.2/100
Tarragindi
82.4/100
Tarragindi for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Gravatt
59.2/100
Tarragindi
82.4/100
Crime rate
Mount Gravatt
62.7 / 1k
Tarragindi
26.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Gravatt
237
Tarragindi
704
Population
Mount Gravatt
3,733
Tarragindi
11,035
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Gravatt | Tarragindi |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.2/100 | 82.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 62.7 / 1k | 26.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 84 |
| Walkability | 73.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 237 | 704 |
| Population | 3,733 | 11,035 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Mount Gravatt is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Tarragindi is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Tarragindi keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Gravatt pulls ahead on schools and education options, whereas Tarragindi is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Tarragindi, while Mount Gravatt remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.